Evaluating categorisation and clinical relevance of drug-related problems in medication reviews.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the categorisation and clinical relevance of DRPs identified by community pharmacists, and further, to assess the quality of interventions with the patients and the physicians as documented by the pharmacists. SETTING: 23 Norwegian community pharmacies. METHOD: Patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited by 24 community pharmacists who performed structured medication reviews based on the patients' drug profiles and patient interviews. The DRPs identified were subsequently categorised. An evaluation group (EG) retrospectively evaluated the reviews. Clinical/practical relevance of each DRP and quality of community pharmacists' intervention with patients and physician were scored. Average agreement between the EG and the community pharmacists was calculated. Internal agreement in the EG was calculated using a modified version of Fleiss' Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included (mean age 62 years, 52% female, on average prescribed 8.7 drugs). The pharmacists identified 88 DRPs in 43 of the patients. The most common DRPs were adverse drug reactions (22%) and wrong drug or dose used by patient (14%). Anti-diabetic drugs and lipid modifying drugs were associated with the most DRPs. The EG agreed with detection and categorisation of DRPs in more than 80% of the cases. The clinical/practical relevance of the detected DRPs was scored by the EG to be high or medium in 87% of the cases. The quality of the follow-up with patients and physicians was scored to be good or satisfactory in 93 and 98% of the cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-defined categories of DRPs supported by structured forms were reliable and valid tools for identifying DRPs. The evaluation demonstrated that community pharmacists were able to identify DRPs of high to medium clinical/practical relevance, and to perform follow-ups of the DRPs with the patients and the physicians with a good or satisfactory quality.

Nateglinide improves postprandial hyperglycemia and insulin secretion in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Postprandial hyperglycemia (PPHG) frequently occurs among renal transplant recipients (RTR). Reduced early insulin response (EIR) after a meal leads to impaired suppression of endogenous glucose production and subsequently PPHG, which is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Nateglinide is a rapid acting insulin secretagogue inducing an EIR after a meal. Our main objective was to investigate the safety and effect of nateglinide treatment on postprandial plasma glucose excursions and insulin secretion in RTR with PPHG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 14 Caucasian RTR with new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM; n = 6) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; n = 8) were included. The insulin response and glucose excursions were measured for 240 min after a standardized liquid meal at baseline and after two-wk treatment with nateglinide. RESULTS: Treatment with nateglinide was followed by a significant decrease in mean two-h plasma glucose from 10.5 mmol/L (3.1) to 7.6 mmol/L (2.1; p < 0.001) and a decline in total postprandial area under the curve (AUC) of glucose concentration (p < 0.001). Both estimated EIR and the late insulin response increased significantly (p = 0.008 and p = 0.003, respectively). No serious adverse event was observed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Treating RTR with nateglinide for two-wk significantly improved PPHG, increased the insulin response following a standardized meal and was well tolerated.